|
#война #этика #цитата
Чтобы потом не гуглить: "From a briefing by NATO spokesman Jamie Shea. Brussels, May 25, 1999: Question : If you say the [Yugoslav] army has a lot of generators, why are you depriving the country of 70% not only of electricity but also of water supply, because, according to you, [NATO] only strikes military installations. Answer : Unfortunately, command and control systems also depend on electricity. If Milosevic really wants his citizens to have water and electricity, all he has to do is accept NATO’s terms, and we will stop this campaign. Until he does, we will continue to attack the targets that supply his army with electricity*. If there are consequences for the population, that is his [Milosevic’s] problem. Water and electricity are used against the people of Serbia, we have “cut them off” permanently or for a long time for the sake of the lives of the 1.6 million Kosovars who have been driven from their homes and whose lives have been badly damaged. Not everyone will like that difference, but to me that difference is fundamental.* https://labouraffairs.com/2022/12/02/nato-serbia-and-russia-ukraine/" 25 ноября в 15:40
1 |
|
финикийский_торговец, консеквенциализм - это метаэтика. Т.е. шаблон этики. Он, во-первых, может быть построен по-разному, во-вторых, может быть построен от разных базовых ценностей. Что порождает целый спектр противоречащих друг другу консеквенциалистских этик. И никуда не исчезает дилемма заключённого, увы. В масштабах людей с ней даже проще, чем в масштабах государств, на мой взгляд. Это я так, просто заметил со стороны, для ответа по стартовому посту нужно знать историю лучше, чем её знаю я.
|
|