Три рубля
Ок, тогда умер с возможностью ожить? Иначе я не понимаю, как вы себе представляете, что в этот раз палочка против него сработала как надо, а во все остальные разы - нет.
А если игнорировать интервью Ро, можно надумать и что часть души Волдеморта в нём до сих пор жива.
Если бы он рассчитывал на это, он бы не говорил Гарри, что человек, желающий убить ТЛ, должен сначала уничтожить хоркруксы.
Я сейчас подумала, что всё-таки единственное объяснение, хоть сначала и сама его отбросила - это запуск магии жертвы. Гарри должен был пожертвовать собой, как его мать, чтобы ТЛ не мог причинить вред остальным.
Достаточность готовности (или же смерти с возвращением в этот мир) и в том, и в другом случае.
Это что ещё за объяснение?)))
Помимо книг, Ро и в интервью поясняла, как магия жертвы работает. И повторила, что прецедентов не было.

ES: This is one of my burning questions since the third book - why did Voldemort offer Lily so many chances to live? Would he actually have let her live?

JKR: Mmhm.

ES: Why?

JKR: [silence] Can't tell you. But he did offer, you're absolutely right. Don't you want to ask me why James's death didn't protect Lily and Harry? There’s your answer, you've just answered your own question, because she could have lived and chose to die. James was going to be killed anyway. Do you see what I mean? I’m not saying James wasn't ready to; he died trying to protect his family but he was going to be murdered anyway. He had no - he wasn't given a choice, so he rushed into it in a kind of animal way, I think there are distinctions in courage. James was immensely brave. But the caliber of Lily's bravery was, I think in this instance, higher because she could have saved herself. Now any mother, any normal mother would have done what Lily did. So in that sense her courage too was of an animal quality but she was given time to choose. James wasn't. It's like an intruder entering your house, isn't it? You would instinctively rush them. But if in cold blood you were told, "Get out of the way," you know, what would you do? I mean, I don't think any mother would stand aside from their child. But does that answer it? She did very consciously lay down her life. She had a clear choice -

ES: And James didn't.

JKR: Did he clearly die to try and protect Harry specifically given a clear choice? No. It's a subtle distinction and there's slightly more to it than that but that's most of the answer.

MA: Did she know anything about the possible effect of standing in front of Harry?

JKR: No - because as I've tried to make clear in the series, it never happened before. No one ever survived before. And no one, therefore, knew that could happen.

MA: So no one - Voldemort or anyone using Avada Kedavra - ever gave someone a choice and then they took that option [to die] -

JKR: They may have been given a choice, but not in that particular way.